Global PR Summit 2015
The most important event in the global communications world’s calendar.
The key global benchmark of PR agency rankings, industry size and global comms trends.
The most creatively awarded PR campaigns and agencies in the world.
The Holmes Report profiles marketing and communications innovators from across North America and EMEA.
In-depth annual research into the PR industry's efforts to raise creative standards.
Coverage of the Cannes Lions from the Holmes Report in association with H+K Strategies.
Creative work, trends and views from the global public relations industry.
Dedicated to exploring the new frontiers of PR as it dives deeper into social media, content and analytics.
Our coverage of key technology PR trends and challenges around the world.
From brand marketing to conscious consumerism, coverage of key marketing and PR trends worldwide.
Coverage of healthcare PR and marketing.
Financial communications, sector news and mergers and acquisitions.
Coverage of global corporate reputation and communications news and trends.
The world's biggest PR awards programme, dedicated to benchmarking the best PR work from across the globe.
A high-level forum designed for senior practitioners to address the critical issues facing the profession.
Exploring the innovation and disruption that is redefining influence and engagement.
The Holmes Report's annual selections for PR Agencies of the Year, across all of the world's major markets.
Bringing together in-house comms leaders with PR firms to discuss critical global issues.
US consumers seeking health information online are more likely to visit Wikipedia than health magazine websites or Facebook.
Holmes Report 22 Sep 2012 // 11:00PM GMT
US consumers seeking health information online are more likely to visit Wikipedia than health magazine websites or Facebook, connect through a PC rather than a mobile device, and be swayed by word of mouth over direct-to-consumer advertising, according to results from a new national consumer survey conducted by Makovsky Health and Kelton.
The research investigates consumers’ overall engagement with online healthcare information, and reveals specific consumer preferences for online publishing sources, channels and even devices, and finds that consumers rate government agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Food and Drug Administration and advocacy organizations among the most credible.
“Whether they want guidance for an informed conversation with their doctor, or the support of a larger community coping with the same illness, consumers seek trusted sources for health information,” says Gil Bashe, executive vice president and Practice director, Makovsky Health. “These new survey results enhance our understanding of how and with whom consumers connect online, and help ensure that credible, useful information is readily accessible to the patients who need it.”
Adds Tom Bernthal, CEO of research consultancy Kelton: “The macro-trend—globally and in the US—is moving from web to mobile. Yet, when it comes to healthcare, data show the desktop search is vastly preferred, meaning the newest channels might not be best for healthcare marketers.”
People are still most likely to use a personal computer (90 percent)—and not a smartphone (7 percent) or tablet (4 percent)—to search for health information online. And PC-reliant consumers are more likely than smartphone/tablet-reliant consumers to visit a pharma website after receiving a diagnosis from their doctor (52 percent vs. 31 percent), although smartphone/tablet users are far more likely than PC users (43 percent vs. 24 percent) to visit a pharma website after they experience a few symptoms.
If seeking information about their own medical conditions, consumers trust advocacy group and
government agency websites nearly as much (33 percent) as they trust websites with medical information, such as WebMD (35 percent). And a personal recommendation from a friend, family member or colleague (33 percent) is a stronger motivator to visit a pharma website than TV advertisements (27 percent), magazine advertisements (14 percent), digital advertisements (13 percent), or discounts (16 percent).
Consumers also report an overall preference for externally-sourced information, though user-generated content on Wikipedia is gaining high levels of trust:
• 56 percent of Americans use WebMD for healthcare information
• 31 percent visit Wikipedia, which has emerged as a trusted source of credible information, an increase of 13 percent from Makovsky Health’s 2011 survey
• 29 percent visit health magazine websites online (e.g., Prevention, Women’s Health)
• Social networking sites are utilized by far fewer Americans for healthcare information: Facebook (17 percent), YouTube (15 percent), blogs (13 percent), and Twitter feeds with links to other resources (6 percent)
In the context of Facebook, consumers are just as likely to rank a pharma company-generated page about a specific medication (9 percent) as their most trusted Facebook source as they are a pharma company’s disease-state page (6 percent), far lower than Facebook content generated by sources such as government agencies or patient groups.
But when it comes to news and announcements from a company, consumers are most likely to believe traditional sources:
• 53 percent are most likely to believe company news from a press release
• 29 percent are most apt to believe what is posted on a company website
• Official corporate Facebook pages are a distant third (12 percent), while only 2 percent have the strongest faith in company news posted on Twitter
Aarti Shah 02 Jul 2015
Only 40% of the Influence 100 are active on Twitter — and the most active users tend to be men.
Paul Holmes 28 Jun 2015
A question of definitions, a time to stop sounding so defensive, and reasons to really celebrate cre ...
We feel that the views of the reader are as important as the views of the writer. Please contact us at [email protected]Signup For Our Newsletter Media Kits/Editorial Calendar Jobs Postings Sitemap
© The Holmes Report 2014